What should neurodivergent adults ask before changing medication? | NeuroDiversion

A NeuroDiversion conversation

What should neurodivergent adults ask before changing medication?

Psychiatrist Kristin Budde starts medication conversations with a different question: What problem are we trying to solve? She explains how neurodivergence, mental health, and physical health can overlap—and how patients can bring the whole picture to a prescriber.

Kristin Budde
Psychiatrist at Walnut Health Photo by Ian Johns.

When neurodivergence, mental health symptoms, and physical health concerns overlap, why can a familiar psychiatric diagnosis still be an incomplete starting point?

The glib (or maybe extremely wise?) answer is that it feels incomplete because it IS incomplete.

Imagine you're trying to address “anxiety” with treatment-as-usual in someone who's really just overstimulated. In a case like this, you might reach for psychotherapy and/or medications and they may help, but in an ideal world you'll get to the bottom of the overstimulation and try to help someone better manage or avoid that.

Another problem is that all these frameworks can influence one another. Take food and ADHD. People with ADHD often struggle with binge eating (in fact, Vyvanse is FDA-approved for both ADHD and binge eating disorder), or sometimes forget to eat, or experience decreased appetite when they take stimulants. If you try to treat binge eating in someone with ADHD without addressing the stimming aspect of eating, or limited impulse control in ADHD, or the metabolic implications of eating too much, you might have less success than if you talked through the intersection with people.

Someone told me once that all frameworks are ultimately wrong, but some are useful. None of these frameworks—neurodivergence, physical health, mental health—is wrong in itself, and they're all useful, but none of them will usually give you a complete picture of what's going on with someone.

Before asking, “Which medication should I take?” how should someone and their clinician define the change they’re hoping for?

I usually ask people the magic pill question: If you could take a magic pill that would fix one thing, what would it be? The answer is usually telling and specific to that person's life. Something like “I'd be less frustrated with my kids” or “I'd feel less afraid to talk to my co-workers” or “I'd actually relax for once.”

Or another way to think about it: Before you ask, “Which medication should I take?” ask, “What problem are we trying to solve?”

ADHD is not a problem; missing the bus every day is a problem. Once you define the problem (or the change you're hoping for), then you can start thinking about solutions. The solution could be medication. It could also be collecting belongings the night before you usually miss the bus. If you take the time to define the problem, then it's much easier to know whether your solution—meds or otherwise—is working.

When several diagnoses, symptoms, and past treatments are in the mix, what’s most useful to bring to a medication appointment?

First, the tangible stuff: If you're seeing a new provider, bring a list of medications you've tried in the past and anything you can remember about what happened when you tried them. It'll help your provider get a sense of what has worked or not, and it's also required if your provider ends up needing to submit a prior authorization for something. I realize collecting a comprehensive list could be a huge and completely overwhelming undertaking, especially if the reason you're seeking help is because you're struggling to organize tasks, but you'll only have to do it once! If you remember to save it. Which, I get it.

Also bring a history of any medical problems in you or your family, any general medications or supplements you're taking, and which medical problems you've been diagnosed with in the past.

Second, a less tangible but no less important item to bring is a sense of what you feel you need help with (ask yourself the magic pill question if you're stuck). And remember, your diagnosis doesn't necessarily determine exactly which medication change makes the most sense. Let's say you have ADHD. A stimulant is often a reasonable option, but it may not be the right move if the problem you're trying to solve is feeling really anxious and unable to sleep. A very common question people come to me with is, “I'm on too many medications and I have no idea what any of them are doing.” Even that can be a good place to start.

I always try to tailor prescribing to treat as many of these potential problems as possible—for example, prescribing clonidine rather than a stimulant in someone with ADHD symptoms and hot flashes, since this can help with both—so ask if there's one medication that could address multiple problems, and whether there's a medication decrease that could help.

So, to sum up:

  1. Know previous medications and supplements, medical problems, and family history.
  2. Know what problem you most want fixed.
  3. Ask whether a medication decrease could help with this problem, or if one medication could address two problems.
  4. Ask how your provider understands the relationship between these diagnoses.
Kristin Budde smiling at her desk beside a laptop, notes, and a colorful mug
Photo by Daniel Barron.

In Kristin's words

“ADHD is not a problem; missing the bus every day is a problem.”

How can sleep, pain, hormones, nutrition, sensory load, or other physical-health factors change what looks like a mental health symptom or how someone experiences a medication?

Oh geez. Don't forget inflammation while we're at it. The short answer is that any of these things can look like a mental health symptom, and any of them can change how effective medication is—or isn't. Tangible example: Iron deficiency makes people feel exhausted and inattentive, and iron is absolutely necessary for your brain to make dopamine, so if iron is low, attention is worse, AND medications might not be as effective for ADHD. If that weren't complicated enough, these can affect each other—for example, poor attention makes it harder to eat well, which can in turn make your attention even worse.

These things are complicated for everyone, but some are particularly problematic in divergent populations. There seem to be higher rates of autoimmune disorders in autistic populations, and it seems clear that perimenopause and PMDD are more severe in these populations, too. So divergence—or some aspect of it related to collagen or sensitivity or gut permeability or whatever—seems to be yet another variable that affects how these processes play out, although I don't know how well-understood the effects are.

Another example: If you really drill down into what's happening when some people have panic attacks, oftentimes they're hungry, or overstimulated, or really tired. If you just throw them a benzo or an SSRI, it can definitely help, but you might miss an opportunity to help them suffer less—for example, by helping them better manage their blood sugar, notice when they're starting to get overstimulated, or recognize that something will be overstimulating and plan ahead with some breaks and/or box breathing. The flip side of having a complicated problem with a lot of factors is that there are a lot of different levers to pull.

What’s diagnostic overshadowing, and how can it complicate care for autistic people or people with ADHD when mental and physical health concerns overlap?

It's pretty much chalking any new problem up to whatever diagnosis someone already has. Tired? Probably just depression. Headaches? That pesky depression. Low appetite? Depression strikes again. But if we stop at depression or autism, we might not uncover the celiac disease that's actually driving someone's fatigue and low appetite. I think this is potentially made worse by the fact that some divergent folks are either very acutely attuned to what's happening in their bodies or have a really hard time recognizing and/or describing what they're feeling, which means they end up reporting their internal state differently than most people.

My experience working in mental health is that providers are much more likely to call something “treatment refractory” than wonder whether they've gotten the diagnosis wrong in the first place. Someone with undiagnosed celiac could be labeled with “treatment-refractory depression” because they're always tired and have a low appetite and SSRIs don't help them, but the reason the meds don't help is that no amount of Lexapro is going to make up for the fact that gluten is slowly and invisibly killing you.

When a medication helps one problem but makes another part of life harder, how should someone describe that tradeoff to their prescriber?

So, pretty much every medication is going to have some sort of side effect. We're generally good at asking about whether symptoms improve and about major side effects—for example, is your sleep worse? Is your appetite changing? It can get hard when the side effect is vague or internalized. In other words, we're better at noticing side effects (and diagnoses, for that matter) that are problematic for other people. Some people with ADHD don't like taking stimulants because they make them feel like they're less themselves. They struggle to be as creative, or they feel like their thoughts are boxed in. This isn't a side effect you'll probably be asked about—as opposed to “Are you sleeping okay?”—but it can feel really devastating and is hard to describe in any way other than, “I just don't feel like myself.”

So to get back to your actual question, first take some time to notice how the things you love are being affected. And then just explain them as clearly as possible. If it feels like Vyvanse is making you more attuned to hunger cues, which you don't love, just say that. You don't have to interpret what's happening—just explain the tradeoff as plainly as possible and hope your prescriber will take you up on a conversation. And don't despair! Oftentimes simple fixes can help, like adjusting the dose or the timing, or taking it with food, or skipping a stimulant on the weekends.

After starting or changing a medication, what’s worth tracking, and what should someone ask about follow-up or when to call sooner?

This answer is going to be a very unsatisfying “it depends.” So first, back to the start, remember what problem you're trying to solve and try to keep track of that, at least loosely. If you're always missing the bus, keep track of whether that shifts, or whether your mornings feel less impossible.

The most worrisome potential side effects tend to vary by medication, so it's always worth asking your prescriber when and how best to reach out. Broadly speaking, new or worsening thoughts about not wanting to be around are always worth reaching out about, dramatic changes in sleep or appetite, rashes, or anything that just feels off. And please please please don't hesitate to reach out if you have a question. Few things upset me more than learning someone was suffering for a whole month with a problem or side effect I could have fixed in a flash.

Kristin Budde smiling outdoors beneath string lights
Photo by Daniel Barron.

A little more personal

Why Kristin chose this work

Three questions about what shaped the work—and what still matters outside it.

You’ve described your approach as holistic and narrative-informed. What can a person’s story reveal that a checklist or diagnosis might miss?

To be fair, I do run through the checklists for medicolegal and billing reasons, and to make sure I didn't forget to ask something important. But if you go back to the magic pill question, someone's story can give you a better north star for what you're treating than a checklist. If you improve all someone's checkboxes at the next visit but they're still getting irritable with their kids, then you've failed (even though the checkboxes would say otherwise). Medication usually helps people with their attention and concentration, but studies have found that medication can also improve quality of life. I think this gets at the difference between checklists and stories—you can improve someone's checkboxes, but what you really want to do is help them write a better story for themselves.

Or take social anxiety, one of my least favorite diagnoses. You can tick the boxes and diagnose someone with social anxiety disorder, but so what? Maybe this person has a vague but ultimately correct feeling that they're reading social cues differently than others. Maybe they're picking up on something icky in the social dynamic that most people are missing or ignoring. Maybe they're shy or introverted and that is not even actually a problem. A diagnosis like this also presumes that if only someone did the right exposures or took the right meds, they'd be “normal,” and that's (1) not true and (2) really alienating for people who do everything “right” but still struggle.

DSM diagnosis: Social anxiety disorder
Treatment: SSRI

KSB (that's me) diagnosis: Thoughtful, well-intentioned person who prefers solitude yet still ventures out to interact despite knowing that this might be incredibly draining (even if it's necessary, enjoyable, or worth it)
Treatment: Maybe SSRI, but first decide whether this is actually a problem—for example, if it's getting in the way of work or affecting relationships. Also ask about whether some of this is perimenopause-related and consider estrogen rather than SSRI, particularly in someone with high risk of osteoporosis. Check a thyroid level, too, and while you're at it see if they're getting enough exercise and eating a vegetable once in a while.

Both are technically correct, but I like mine more.

What’s one belief about prescribing that’s become more nuanced as you’ve worked with autistic people and other neurodivergent adults?

Oof. I have a worry that one of the reasons divergent folks so often end up with ten million diagnoses or a million “failed” med trials is that we're really just failing to identify the problem, and failing to revisit our thoughts on what's happening—or “reformulate,” as they say in the biz. I'm becoming convinced that prescribing in divergent populations may ultimately just be a somewhat different prospect, and that the meds and doses and approach really just need to be different. I feel like in this population people are more likely to be extremely sensitive to small doses of medication, or feel like literally no medication does anything at all.

I'm also quicker to think about hormones and metabolism and inflammation (all of which are inextricably linked, BTW). None of this, sadly, was part of my training at all, but I do feel lucky to live in an era where it's easier than ever to learn new things.

People say in medical training that half of what you learn will be wrong by the time you retire, but nobody tells you which half. I think divergent prescribing may be part of that wrong half, which is a huge problem. But I suppose identifying the problem is half the battle. I feel like I've heard someone say it's important to first identify the problem.

At ND26, you invited both professionals and individuals to Ask the Psychiatrist. What question from that room, or pattern across the questions, has stayed with you?

I'm remembering a dad who asked how best to support his daughter. I don't know this dad or his daughter or their struggles, but I hope she knows how desperately he wants to support her and make her feel seen, and I hope she'll learn one day how many lovely people out there are struggling with similar things. The best part of this question was the answer, which came not from me, but from a young person in the audience who gave him some advice about how best to show up for young adult kids. It's hopeful to think that so many people are working on the same problems I'm facing, and I love when solutions come from unexpected places.

I think the clearest pattern I recall is that people were just so genuinely interested in how to prescribe better, and coming to it with a really hopeful attitude despite the challenges and the complexity. I was moved also by the stories I heard—like, literally so moved that I went and trained to become a menopause prescriber because I was so upset that one of the panelists said nobody really does both psych and hormones. I try to remember when I'm obsessing over different serotonin receptors that I'm not alone in this, and that I really do think with enough work and creativity we can figure some of this out and help people suffer less and live better. I think the answers are out there if we keep looking, and maybe all we need is a little more conversation and a bunch of people with superb pattern-recognition skills taking a crack at it.

About the speaker

Kristin Budde, MD, MPH

Kristin Budde, MD, MPH, is a Boston-based psychiatrist at Walnut Health. She works with all sorts of people, but loves especially dearly her work with folks who’ve been told by other providers they don’t have autism or ADHD or perimenopause or POTS. Read her writing on Substack.

Website reluctantprescriber.substack.com NeuroDiversion speaker roster

This interview was conducted in September 2026 and edited for clarity.

By NeuroDiversion · Last updated 24 October 2026